The federal government should provide all americans with free internet access

Google has said publicly that mass, free WiFi would spark an explosion in innovation. Economist Robert Atkinson argues that such a plan will reduce the desire for companies to offer lower prices, better products, and better customer service, as well as lessening incentive to come up with new and innovative ideas.

Increasing internet access would be a key goal in building the future generation.

the us government should provide internet service for every citizen?

This is not to mention that college debt is exempt from bankruptcy. They maintain that the availability of broadband for all would provide a number of other highly valuable public benefits.

Just imagine what faster, nationwide WiFi could mean for live broadcasts online, via Google Hangouts, which could include nationwide ads that are "televised" over that the Internet to tablets and smartphones. If ever there was a need for "education improvement", this is it.

Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said this was not the case, in an April ruling.

The government should provide internet service for every citizen

We say no. The NTIA contended that universal, affordable access was being provided in the home, workplace, classroom, and library. AI, robotics and the digital transformation of European business. In , Kevin J. To ensure that America leads in the clean energy economy, every American should be able to use broadband to track and manage their real-time energy consumption. It is also possible to modernize the electric grid with broadband, making it more reliable and less prone to outages. High School graduation rates have barely budged since the 90's. The development of interstate highways and airports in the 20th century connected us even further, cutting down a day long journey into a few hours. Urban access: Proponents of national broadband policy believe that it would have a positive effect on the urban poor and provide them with many more opportunities for Internet access. The Internet Tax Freedom Act merely prevents states from imposing their sales tax, or any other kind of gross receipts tax, on certain online services. Genachowski said over 20 countries had plans for broadband access, and that the lack of access in rural and low-income areas in the United States resulted in "leaving millions behind". Many Americans are falling behind the global workforce. It was the massive mobilization of government forces that connected this country via technology. On the basic issue of expanded access to broadband, the FCC recommendations include: Congress should make clear that tribal, state, regional and local governments can build broadband networks. Republicans in the United States Congress and at the FCC, and cable and telephone companies were expected to oppose the regulations necessary to make the broadband plan work.

All of these costs are going to add up to many billions of dollars. Possible government waste and lack of attention to real user needs: Opponents of national broadband policy warn that in an attempt to achieve the desired goal of broadband for all, the government will waste billions of dollars on an infrastructure that people do not need or cannot use.

should the government provide internet access

Electronic health records would improve efficiency and lower costs. The Post reported that "the new WiFi networks would also have much farther reach, allowing for a driverless car to communicate with another vehicle a mile away. There's not much detail on how it would accomplish this, other than that it would force local TV stations to sell chunks of airwave spectrum rights to the U.

should the government regulate the internet
Rated 10/10 based on 41 review